Why is it irresponsible?
The argument is straightforward: even if you're very rich that you don't have to work at all (which is not true for 99.99% of the world's population), you just won't have time to take care of all of them. Yeah, you can hire nannies to help you. But, what's the point? To have as many offspring that bear your genes? Why would you want to do that?
In most cases, the parents are far from being very rich and they don't even have enough money to give their children a barely acceptable environment to grow up in. What happens next? Welfare, money that have alternative uses to solve other societal problems, comes in and pay for the child expenses. Since the welfare money is limited, the kids aren't likely to get the care, nutrition and education they need. As a result, they became troubled teens and in the worst case turn into criminals and cause harm to other people.
Come to think about it, this is bad for the parents, bad for the children and bad for society.
We're talking about lose-lose-lose situation here, which is very bad (usually there's upside and downside for a decision, like raising tax). Let's think about what we can do to alleviate this problem.
Can we resort to something like the One Child Policy in China? No, the human rights activists in the U.S. will use all means to make sure that it won't happen.
"It is a very basic human right for a woman to bear children!"
"That is a violation of our freedom!"
Anyone can easily think of a dozen of emotional and persuasive slogans like that. Well, yeah, if we practice our rights and freedom responsibly, why would we need any policy like that, huh?
Basic economics tell us that when a cost induced by a person is shared by other people, one will likely abuse it as long as the reward is greater than the portion of the cost s/he bears. That's why factories tend to pollute air/water when there's no law that forbid them from doing it.
When a woman has kids that she's unable to raise, the cost (welfare) is shared by all the taxpayers. I'm not sure what the reward is in this case (the happiness of having kids?), but, similar to the factory case, people will tend to abuse the system when they know they've a golden parachute to take care of their kids.
Although I don't know about the statistics, let's be optimistic and assume that the people who abuse the welfare system are the minority. In that case, we can focus on the people who do not have the intention to bear child irresponsibly but do it because of ignorance. I can think of the following reasons for this group of people:
- they don't know how to use birth control
- they don't know how to find out whether they're prepared (both mentally and financially) to raise kids
The second case is the one that the government isn't doing enough about. To solve this problem, high school students should be forced to take classes that teach them
- what kind of responsibilities childbearing gives them and what it means to their lives
- how much money will be needed to raise a kid (with all the expenses broken down that clearly show the money needed until their children get a college degree)
If you're reading this, I hope is that you'll think
So, please, think.
I think people who read your post won't be the same one as those that won't have jobs but will have six babies.
I think fundamentally, there is no way to ensure/regulate the really fridge elements of the society without seriously harming bending the principles we love.
In the particular case of the 6 + 8 babies mother. The question, I think, is to the doctor who performed the additional implant. Was he operating under the you pay me, I will do whatever think you ask, no question asked? We may have a better chance to fix the system through that.
加燦: Thanks for your comment!ReplyDelete
Yes I agree that my readers probably won't have a problem with irresponsible childbearing. That's why I think that the government should start advocating responsible childbearing in high schools. If we wait beyond after high school, it's already too late.
Regarding the doctor, the government should probably put a limit on the number of embryos s/he may implant in a woman's body. What would be a good number? Maybe 2 or 3. It's impossible to have everyone agreed on one number but then we need to specify one to get things working, just like we make 21 the legal age for drinking.